You are viewing m_stiefvater

 
 
12 February 2013 @ 11:54 am
Truth & The Thinking Writer  
This is gonna be a writing one.

I haven’t done a writing post in awhile because I feel like, in many ways, I have said all the things that I can possibly say about writing. And in other ways, I feel like I am still trying to figure this whole literacy thing out for myself and who am I to tell you anything. Also, I don’t want to be that tedious person who talks about their job all the time. Blah-blah-blah-I-make-up-whole-worlds-for-a-living-blah-blah-blah.

However, I feel as if this topic is actually relevant to readers as well as writers, so I’m going to give it a go. I want to talk about how we, as writers, ought to think about how we say things on purpose and also say things by accident. And I also want to talk about how I don’t mean messaging or pedagogy.

Let’s do this thing.

When I first started out as a writer, I didn’t think about any of this. At all. I didn’t think about theme. I didn’t think about what people might take away from my writing. I couldn’t. Writing was a bunch of balloons and it took all my concentration just to hold them all. Sometimes one of the balloons would get away and I would just have to hope it was not an important one, because I didn’t have any hands free to try to grab it.

Now, however, I don’t write a scene WITHOUT thinking about this. Which brings me to:

SAYING THINGS ON PURPOSE

My novels are character-driven, which means reader satisfaction comes largely from seeing people change over the course of the novel. For instance, I knew I wanted Sean from The Scorpio Races to start out solitary and end up learning the power of human relationships. Right here: this is my first decision. I am consciously choosing to say that being solitary < good family relationships.* Sean Kendrick becomes a thesis statement and the novel’s events become my proof.

*this is grossly over-simplified but basically blah-blah-I-make-up-whole-worlds-for-a-living-blah-blah

At the very beginning of the novel, Sean-As-A-Child watches his father die messily during the races. It’s an action that could have many different effects on a person. As a writer, I have to make a choice for my character in this moment.

So, Sean sees his father die. As a result, he vows to never be afraid — his father had been afraid before he died — and he also withdraws from human contact.

Decision! Done! But if I’m a good writer, I’ll question it: Do I think I’m saying a true thing? Let's look. What I’m saying is I think seeing someone die could make you guard your heart against later damage. But what I’m also saying, you'll notice, is I think a kid can watch his father die and not be destroyed by it. I’m saying if you grow up on a savage island populated by savage creatures and men, you might already be inured to death as a child.

As a writer, I should know that I’m saying not one of these things, but all of them. And as a writer, I have to believe they could be true reactions, or I should change what I’m saying.

Now, this was why I got upset about literary rape earlier this year. Because I felt writers were thoughtlessly and simplistically using rape as a defining moment for their female characters. For instance, I read a novel where a woman was raped and as a consequence became a cold-blooded killer/ sex fiend. What the writer was saying, by choice or by not, was a thesis statement about rape. Yes, the writer says, I think it is plausible that being raped would remove all of your tender emotions and render you without empathy or soul. And also make you crazy for . . . more sex?

If that is what the writer believes, go for it. Write what you believe is true.** But as a reader, I want to feel that the writer has thought about it. That they know what they’re doing and are in control. That they’ve made character decisions they believe could be true. Not just character decisions that are easy.

**and yes, I do think all fiction of every genre should aspire to truth in order to have maximum emotional resonance.***

***and if you're not writing to make readers have FEELS, what in the world are you writing for?****

****fine, fine. But I'm talking commercial fiction here. It's what I do*****

*****blah-blah-I-make-up-whole-worlds-for-a-living-blah-blah

Which brings me to:

SAYING THINGS BY ACCIDENT
As writers, we all have our biases, and a good writer — one that’s learning how to hold all the balloons without letting them escape— will be aware of their own. And a good writer will know that it's hard to avoid saying things by accident. For instance, here’s some things I should know about myself:

1- I have no negative baggage with kissing. So I’ll tend to see a kiss as a positive. Not universally true, Maggie.
2 - I like living in the middle of nowhere. I have to work extra hard to not make all of my characters prefer the middle of nowhere. Some people prefer cities, Maggie.
3 - I play musical instruments. Not everyone plays musical instruments, Maggie.
4 - I freaking love cars. Not everyone cares about manual transmissions, Maggie.
5 - I have a complicated and adoring relationship with my father. Why you write so many daddy issues, Maggie?
6 - You have an underdeveloped sense of self-preservation, Maggie. Remember to make your characters afraid, Maggie!

We bring our own biases and beliefs and politics to the table as a writer. I don’t think we have to try to scrub them all out — specificity and voice are glorious things. But the more we make those subconscious choices into conscious ones, the more control we’ll have. And more control means better writing. Which brings me to:

MESSAGING

I don’t like it. People ask me a lot of time if I’m trying to send a good message to the youth of America, since I write for teens. I’m not, I’m afraid. I would if I was writing for middle graders. Because they are young and squashy and their heads are still being formed. But I write for upper teens, and I’m not going to condescend to Teach Them Lessons.

I did worry when I started this post that folks would read it as a handbook for subliminal messages and pedagogy. But when I say I’m choosing what my book is saying, it’s not because I’m trying to say what’s Right. It’s because I’m trying to say what’s True.

tumblr tracker
 
 
Current Music: "Youth, Speed, Troubles, Cigarettes." - Cassius
 
 
( 17 comments — Leave a comment )
Happy Rowanfairgoldberry on February 12th, 2013 05:25 pm (UTC)
I think any writer who says she is not sending a message is either being disingenuous or not paying attention. Even if you're not putting out the work to cause 'feels', you still are saying something because you think it's worth saying. Because it's an opinion you either hold, or at least think is worthy of consideration. As you say here, you very carefully consider how and what you're communicating, how your own story affects the one you're telling, and what overall messages you've got in your writing even though you're not Sending A Message.

I mean, if you have something to say, then you WANT someone to consider your point of view. And if you have nothing to say or you don't care if it's heard, then why would you write? It makes more sense to do it your way, to say "This is what I acknowledge as my framework, and how it affects the narrative and the story."

I don't see subliminal messages or pedagogy. I see "Maggie's books contain seeds of Maggie's consciousness, just like every author's books contain seeds of their consciousness, and when I read a book there is something in it (maybe not the overt message or even the thing I see as what the book is saying, but something) that the author felt deserved to be heard, deserved my attention, enough to take up the craft and present it to me."

Much love,
Rowan

Edited at 2013-02-12 05:28 pm (UTC)
<3 I Think I Wanna Marry You: mewriterfreek on February 13th, 2013 04:46 am (UTC)
I couldn't agree more with your thought process. I believe every book has something to say, whether or not we catch it. I think Maggie just wanted to steer clear of teaching lessons, which I can understand. Writing for a teenage audience makes it hard to actually teach lessons. We don't really want to hear them, do we? But I do think, that in everything we write, there is a point to it, a point that we feel needs to be shared. So I felt the need to comment here.
paulwoodlin on February 14th, 2013 02:04 am (UTC)
On the issue of writers not paying attention, when watching sitcoms I often find myself dividing shows into those where the writers realize their characters are jerks vs. shows where the writers do not appear to realize their characters are jerks. I stick to reading the first catagory, because their humor isn't as cruel and the writing reveals the ironies of being the jerk character.
swhistedswhisted on February 12th, 2013 05:28 pm (UTC)
Please don't ever stop doing your 'how I write' posts. I am a thirsty sponge. :)

I think I probably struggle the most with saying things by accident, honestly. Sometimes parts of me seem to slip into my characters before I really realize I'm doing it. Perhaps making my own list of 'things I should know about myself' might benefit me.

Thanks for sharing.
paulwoodlin on February 14th, 2013 02:07 am (UTC)
Having one of my best friends read a lot of my stuff helped it a lot. Of course, I am lucky to have a good friend who is also a published novelist and trusts me to take criticism constructively.
Spackle: horses: white on redspacklegeek on February 12th, 2013 07:08 pm (UTC)
But when I say I’m choosing what my book is saying, it’s not because I’m trying to say what’s Right. It’s because I’m trying to say what’s True.

Yes! This is it exactly. And this is why I love reading your stories, because they are filled with truths, and those truths make your stories real.
Anita SaxenaAnita Saxena on February 12th, 2013 07:53 pm (UTC)
Well said
I think the books that I truly respect and hold close to my heart (novels written by yourself and authors like John Green, etc..) are the stories where the author has breathed believable life into their characters. Every motivation, every action, emotion, it makes sense and just feels so REAL. And because everything feels so real, as a reader, I find myself thinking about those characters and stories days, even months after the last page has been read. It's those books, too, that I find joy in reading multiple times.
paulwoodlin on February 14th, 2013 02:09 am (UTC)
Re: Well said
It really is characters that makes books rereadable. If you're just reading for the plot, then once you know the ending it's pointless to read it again. I can enjoy a mystery novel, be so engaged in the story that I read it straight through, but don't have an urge to read them again.
<3 I Think I Wanna Marry You: mewriterfreek on February 13th, 2013 04:50 am (UTC)
I didn't know I needed to read this until I read it. I say a lot of things by accident in my writing, so thank you for sharing your thoughts. I've always taken the "my characters are real and they tell me the story" approach and I tend to put more of myself into my writing than I probably should.

I'm in a fiction writing workshop right now, so I'm going to share this with them. I know they'll benefit from this is well. And I agree with swhisted, never stop doing the "how I write" posts, I love reading them.
paulwoodlin on February 14th, 2013 02:11 am (UTC)
A lot of times I don't know what I think about writing until I'm in a critique group and I've heard a lot of opinions about a story. Meanwhile, I'm sitting there taking notes on why I disagree with things people have said.
asakiyumeasakiyume on February 13th, 2013 12:37 pm (UTC)
What an excellent post. YES. Why is a character doing something, both for themselves as a character and in terms of the overall story? In real life, in the course of the day, if we see seven things happen, they don't all have to add up to a coherent advancement of a plot, but in a novel, the things that a writer chooses to show the audience all should. There's nothing random. That's not to say that the writer is always hitting the audience over the head with the plot development bat, but there should be a reason for everything. If a description mentions a fast-food wrapper blowing at the side of the road, it doesn't have to be plot relevant or character building, but it should be saying something about that landscape--that it's got a touch of human wilderland (to use Anais Mitchell's excellent term) to it, that it's untended, but that it's not pristine wilderness, say.

And yes about our own preferences or experiences and being aware of those! I grew up in a nuclear family without my extended family nearby and without a whole lot of family obligations: many people grow up with lots of siblings and their cousins and aunts and uncles right nearby. Your expectations and behavior will be very different in that sort of a situation.
paulwoodlin on February 14th, 2013 02:14 am (UTC)
Ayn Rand wrote that every single word in "Atlas Shrugged" was there for a reason: the expression of her philosophy. That was a big claim for a 1000 page book, so I took a paragraph long description of music from "Atlas Shrugged" and showed it to my writing students, who, being Chinese majoring in English, had never heard of her. I asked them to deduce her philosophy from the description, and dang if they didn't get it mostly right.
asakiyumeasakiyume on February 14th, 2013 06:24 am (UTC)
I bet she'd be very pleased to hear it!

I think there's always a possibility of being too heavy handed with your message, but just because that's a risk doesn't mean you shouldn't know why you're writing what you're writing. On the contrary, being conscious of your choices is also your best defense, precisely, against being heavy handed.

paulwoodlin on February 15th, 2013 01:00 am (UTC)
Actually, she has often been accused of being heavy handed with her message, but for her the message was the point. When my focus was the theme, I could be heavy handed to, but when I switched my focus towards characters, it helped me get over it.
Rosanna Silverlightmiss_rosie on February 13th, 2013 07:14 pm (UTC)
Teeth digging-in time
Thank you again, Maggie, for giving me something to think about. I will save this post, meditate on it as I go through the first draft of my novel, and really try and dig my teeth into what you're saying here. It's important stuff, and you nailed it.

Please don't stop writing about writing. I love your regular posts to bits but just ... once in a while, do this again. Talk about writing. Please? :) You say stuff that I haven't read anywhere else - stuff I haven't even thought of before, or thought of in the way that you put it.

Oh, and I LOVE the new cover. Very very excited for September!!! :D
paulwoodlin on February 14th, 2013 02:01 am (UTC)
I think you've hit on the head why my first novels were ... okay, bad. They were basically about being a bitter nerd, and you can guess why. The first really good novel I was about my interests, but not about my issues. In the earlier stuff, my "purpose" was just ranting. In the better stuff, it was about explaining.
mdbarnes69 on February 16th, 2013 01:15 am (UTC)
I've followed you since your CP days and what you have written also applies to creating art.
( 17 comments — Leave a comment )