You are viewing m_stiefvater

 
 
03 August 2008 @ 01:27 pm
Why We Love Authors Who Treat Us Bad  
I was musing today that the old saying that women love guys who treat them badly holds true for authors too.

Before you start to snort and through your lattes at the screen, bear with me here. I started thinking about it this weekend because of the response that BREAKING DAWN is inspiring amongst readers. For those of you who live under rocks, BREAKING DAWN is the fourth installment in Stephenie Meyer's YA vampire saga. Even if you don't read them, you oughtta know what they are. Anyway. I have not read the 600 page beast which just came out this weekend, but I have read the hundreds of reviews which have appeared on Amazon and on blogs.
The upshot is this: in the final book of the saga, Stephenie Meyer gives readers everything they could've possibly wanted for the protagonists. A happy marriage, a healthy baby, everyone's in love, no one dies, and they get to stay in town because the main character's dad is cool with his daughter being a vampire (I warned you there were spoilers).

And the readers hate her for it. I mean, the reviews could peel paint. These people are not just unhappy, they are out for blood. But why? They got everything they wanted, right? Everything is perfect! Every thread is tied up! Everything that every reader has ever lusted after for those characters was granted.

But we don't want that, do we? Nay, as readers, we want the author who won't call us in a timely manner after that first date, who makes us pay for lunch, and who makes eyes at our best friend. Let's compare the Breaking Dawn reaction with J. K. Rowling's series. She kills Dumbledore. She kills one of the Weasley twins. She kills Sirius. There are bodies flying left and right. Nobody gets what they want. But at the end of the day, there are no legions of fans shouting that J. K. has ruined the series. They moan "why did Sirius have to die!?" but not "what was she thinking when she killed him?"

Or how about my favorite movie trilogy ever, the Bourne movies? (sorry, Robert Ludlum, I haven't read them, only watched 'em). In the first twenty minutes of the second movie, they off Jason Bourne's beloved love slave in a ruthless and expedient matter. Do we scream and throw the remote? Nah, we rend our clothes a little and say "poor Jason, come to my house, I'll comfort you" and then we watch the rest of the movie and the next one back to back and we love them.


We don't want authors to treat us well. We hate 'em when they do. Complain as we might about a beloved character dying, hell hath no fury like a reader who actually gets what they think they want.

Note to self: kill someone off in the next chapter of my WIP. counter
 
 
( Read 95 commentsLeave a comment )
Maggie Stiefvaterm_stiefvater on August 4th, 2008 12:44 am (UTC)
Oh, that is definitely the only book I've ever cried at too. But I like it because of the STRENGTH of the emotion. So much better than meh.
Jackiefabulousfrock on August 4th, 2008 12:49 am (UTC)
Well, heh...I was so devastated. I'm still not sure that I might have preferred "meh". ^_^ Some people have a higher tolerance for sad endings than me, though. You might be one of them. TTW was definitely beautiful and emotionally powerful...but when I was done I wished someone had warned me how incredibly sad it was, and if so, I never would have read it. In hindsight I'm not really SORRY I read it, but nevertheless, if you handed me a book tomorrow and said "It's amazing, beautiful, sad, the next Time Traveler's Wife", I'd probably pass. When reviews for a movie say "bring tissues" I skip it...
Maggie Stiefvaterm_stiefvater on August 4th, 2008 01:34 am (UTC)
:) I'll keep that in mind. Most sad movies/ books don't even start to get me mopey. I did sulk after the end of TTW, though.